The U.S. school system is removing Catcher in the Rye and To Kill a Mockingbird off the required reading list in schools. They are replacing them with more nonfictional books, like manuals. One suggestion (that I remember) is a manual on Invasive Plants. Reading these kinds of books will help children aquire a better writing style that will be more useful for them in the real world, and it is a better education than learning about Shakespeare.
....So learning how to fight off mint in your garden is better than learning life lessons from classic books. That's frieking fantastic.
I'm sorry, but this just peeves me on soo many levels. For starters, those two books both have great life lessons and should not be omitted. I think they're extrememly important.
Second of all, teaching a kid about PLANTS IS NOT GOING TO PREPARE THEM IN LIFE!!!!!
Let me start with a picture:

wow thats blurry
But i found this picture and instantly related to it. Sorry for the F-bomb in there. But I can openly admit I have no idea how to do anything on that list. I have no idea how to pay taxes, how to buy a house or car, what to look for in a purchase, what's good and what's not, I have no clue how to jumpstart a car, I have no idea how to do that stuff. School is supposed to teach us and prepare us for the real world right? Well, how about the school board worries about that instead? You know, instead of worrying about removing two classic books from the cirriculum to improve our writing skills, how about they focus on adding a class to the cirriculum that will help prepare us for the real world? Because those two books teach kids an important thing, and now they are going to be gone. And kids are still not going to know how to do taxes or buy a house or pay a loan. That's more important than teaching us how to deal with plants.
Okay, I think I'm done.